In capitalist economy, wealthy people store wealth by buying extra houses which keeps price of houses rising. These house wealth often used as collateral for taking credit and then using that credit in investment. So fall in house prices reduce investment and growth.
In socialist China wealthy class are not allowed to speculate and use house as collateral for investment. Chinese government has ensured over supply in housing market so that house price keeps falling. So housing prices are falling and that doesn't effect investment and growth.
China is doing something almost no Western government has had the courage to try: actually deflating a housing bubble on purpose, in the name of livability instead of landlord profits.
For years, Beijing’s mantra has been that housing is “for living in, not for speculation” – a line first pushed by Xi Jinping in 2016 that then became the guiding principle for national real estate policy. That wasn’t just rhetoric. It translated into tighter credit for developers, curbs on speculative buying, and a refusal to use runaway home prices as a quick-and-dirty GDP stimulus. In other words: while the U.S. and much of Europe let housing become a financial asset class first and shelter second, China explicitly moved in the opposite direction.
China already has one of the highest homeownership rates on Earth, with roughly 90% of households owning their homes, far above most rich countries. When your starting point is near-universal ownership, the political calculus shifts. You can prioritize stabilizing or lowering prices to keep housing affordable for younger and poorer households, instead of worshiping “wealth effects” for existing owners at all costs. Beijing’s line has been consistent: stabilize land prices, stabilize home prices, stabilize expectations – and make rental housing and social housing part of the core system, not an afterthought.
There will be real economic pain, failed developers, and long, grinding provincial restructuring. But history may judge it as an almost unheard-of experiment: a major government choosing to puncture a bubble and accept short-term turbulence rather than keep feeding a housing casino. In a world where “housing policy” usually means “protect asset prices at any cost,” that alone is a radical, and instructive, choice.